Articles | Volume 16, issue 4/5
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-315-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-315-2025
Research article
 | 
14 May 2025
Research article |  | 14 May 2025

Elastic anisotropy differentiation of thin shale beds and fractures using a novel hybrid rock physics model

Haoyuan Li, Xuri Huang, Lei Li, Fang Li, and Tiansheng Chen

Related subject area

Subject area: The evolving Earth surface | Editorial team: Seismics, seismology, paleoseismology, geoelectrics, and electromagnetics | Discipline: Geophysics
Combining crosshole and reflection borehole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging controlled freezing in shallow aquifers
Peter Jung, Götz Hornbruch, Andreas Dahmke, Peter Dietrich, and Ulrike Werban
Solid Earth, 15, 1465–1477, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seismic wave modeling of fluid-saturated fractured porous rock: including fluid pressure diffusion effects of discretely distributed large-scale fractures
Yingkai Qi, Xuehua Chen, Qingwei Zhao, Xin Luo, and Chunqiang Feng
Solid Earth, 15, 535–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Integration of automatic implicit geological modelling in deterministic geophysical inversion
Jérémie Giraud, Guillaume Caumon, Lachlan Grose, Vitaliy Ogarko, and Paul Cupillard
Solid Earth, 15, 63–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ground motion emissions due to wind turbines: observations, acoustic coupling, and attenuation relationships
Laura Gaßner and Joachim Ritter
Solid Earth, 14, 785–803, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-785-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seismic amplitude response to internal heterogeneity of mass-transport deposits
Jonathan Ford, Angelo Camerlenghi, Francesca Zolezzi, and Marilena Calarco
Solid Earth, 14, 137–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-137-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-137-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Alabbad, A., Humphrey, J. D., El-Husseiny, A., Altowairqi, Y., and Dvorkin, J. P.: Rock physics modeling and quantitative seismic interpretation workflow for organic-rich mudrocks, Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 227, 211824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211824, 2023. 
Bachrach, R.: Elastic and resistivity anisotropy of shale during compaction and diagenesis: Joint effective medium modeling and field observations, Geophysics, 76, E175–E186, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0381.1, 2011. 
Bandyopadhyay, K.: Seismic anisotropy Geological causes and its implications to reservoir geophysics, Stanford University, https://pangea.stanford.edu/departments/geophysics/dropbox/SRB/public/docs/theses/SRB_118_AUG09_Bandyopadhyay.pdf (last access: 9 May 2025), 2009. 
Brown, R. J. and Korringa, J.: On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid, Geophysics, 40, 608–616, 1975. 
Chapman, M.: Frequency-dependent anisotropy due to meso-scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity, Geophys. Prospect., 51, 369–379, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00384.x, 2003. 
Download
Short summary
Our research aims to accurately differentiate the elastic properties of tight sands with thin shale beds and fractures. Traditional models struggle to distinguish between these two features. We developed a hybrid rock physics model. Our model's reliability is validated against well log data, revealing distinct anisotropic characteristics for thin shale beds and fractures. This model helps identify fractures more accurately, improving geophysical exploration.
Share