Articles | Volume 15, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024
Method article
 | 
02 Feb 2024
Method article |  | 02 Feb 2024

Integration of automatic implicit geological modelling in deterministic geophysical inversion

Jérémie Giraud, Guillaume Caumon, Lachlan Grose, Vitaliy Ogarko, and Paul Cupillard

Related authors

Gravity-derived Antarctic bathymetry using the Tomofast-x open-source code: a case study of Vincennes Bay
Lawrence A. Bird, Vitaliy Ogarko, Laurent Ailleres, Lachlan Grose, Jeremie Giraud, Felicity S. McCormack, David E. Gwyther, Jason L. Roberts, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-211,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-211, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Spatial error constraints reduce overfitting for potential field geophysical inversion
Mark Douglas Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Jeremie Giraud, and Mosayeb Khademi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3754,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3754, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).
Short summary
Tomofast-x 2.0: an open-source parallel code for inversion of potential field data with topography using wavelet compression
Vitaliy Ogarko, Kim Frankcombe, Taige Liu, Jeremie Giraud, Roland Martin, and Mark Jessell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2325–2345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2325-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2325-2024, 2024
Short summary
Utilisation of probabilistic magnetotelluric modelling to constrain magnetic data inversion: proof-of-concept and field application
Jérémie Giraud, Hoël Seillé, Mark D. Lindsay, Gerhard Visser, Vitaliy Ogarko, and Mark W. Jessell
Solid Earth, 14, 43–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-43-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-43-2023, 2023
Short summary
loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification
Guillaume Pirot, Ranee Joshi, Jérémie Giraud, Mark Douglas Lindsay, and Mark Walter Jessell
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject area: The evolving Earth surface | Editorial team: Seismics, seismology, paleoseismology, geoelectrics, and electromagnetics | Discipline: Geophysics
Combining crosshole and reflection borehole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging controlled freezing in shallow aquifers
Peter Jung, Götz Hornbruch, Andreas Dahmke, Peter Dietrich, and Ulrike Werban
Solid Earth, 15, 1465–1477, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Elastic anisotropy differentiation of thin shale beds and fractures using a novel hybrid rock physics model
Haoyuan Li, Xuri Huang, Limin Sa, Lei Li, Fang Li, and Tiansheng Chen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2483,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2483, 2024
Short summary
Seismic wave modeling of fluid-saturated fractured porous rock: including fluid pressure diffusion effects of discretely distributed large-scale fractures
Yingkai Qi, Xuehua Chen, Qingwei Zhao, Xin Luo, and Chunqiang Feng
Solid Earth, 15, 535–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ground motion emissions due to wind turbines: observations, acoustic coupling, and attenuation relationships
Laura Gaßner and Joachim Ritter
Solid Earth, 14, 785–803, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-785-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seismic amplitude response to internal heterogeneity of mass-transport deposits
Jonathan Ford, Angelo Camerlenghi, Francesca Zolezzi, and Marilena Calarco
Solid Earth, 14, 137–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-137-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-137-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Du Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A., and Sorensen, D.: {LAPACK} Users' Guide, 3rd Edn., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA., https://www.netlib.org/lapack/lug/ (last access: 24 September 2023), 1999. 
Barnes, G. J., Lumley, J. M., Houghton, P. I., and Gleave, R. J.: Comparing gravity and gravity gradient surveys, Geophys. Prospect., 59, 176–187, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00900.x, 2011. 
Calcagno, P., Chilès, J. P., Courrioux, G., and Guillen, A.: Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 171, 147–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013, 2008. 
Caumon, G., Lepage, F., Sword, C. H., and Mallet, J.-L.: Building and Editing a Sealed Geological Model, Math. Geol., 36, 405–424, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MATG.0000029297.18098.8a, 2004. 
Clausolles, N., Collon, P., Irakarama, M., and Caumon, G.: Stochastic velocity modeling for assessment of imaging uncertainty during seismic migration: application to salt bodies, Interpretation, 11, T361–T378, 1–67, https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2022-0071.1, 2023. 
Download
Short summary
We present and test an algorithm that integrates geological modelling into deterministic geophysical inversion. This is motivated by the need to model the Earth using all available data and to reconcile the different types of measurements. We introduce the methodology and test our algorithm using two idealised scenarios. Results suggest that the method we propose is effectively capable of improving the models recovered by geophysical inversion and may be applied in real-world scenarios.
Share