Bohlen, T.: Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling,
Comput. Geosci., 28, 887–899, 2002. a
Boore, D. M.: Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure
Appl. Geophys., 160, 635–676, 2003. a
Bozdağ, E., Peter, D., Lefebvre, M., Komatitsch, D., Tromp, J., Hill, J.,
Podhorszki, N., and Pugmire, D.: Global adjoint tomography: first-generation
model, Geophys. J. Int., 207, 1739–1766, 2016. a
Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K. J.: Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification
and Reservoir Characterization, Society of Exploration Geophysicists and
European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, 2007. a
Cui, Y., Olsen, K. B., Jordan, T. H., Lee, K., Zhou, J., Small, P., Roten, D.,
Ely, G., Panda, D. K., Chourasia, A., Levesque, J., Day, S. M., and
Maechling, P.: Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers,
in: 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing,
Networking, Storage and Analysis, New Orleans, LA, USA, 13–19 November 2010, 1–20, 2010. a
Devilee, R. J. R., Curtis, A., and Roy-Chowdhury, K.: An efficient,
probabilistic neural network approach to solving inverse problems: Inverting
surface wave velocities for Eurasian crustal thickness, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 104, 28841–28857, 1999. a
Earp, S. and Curtis, A.: Probabilistic neural network-based 2D travel-time
tomography, Neural Comput. Appl., 1–19, 2020. a
Fichtner, A.: Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion, Springer, 2010. a
Gal, Y.: Uncertainty in Deep Learning, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2016. a
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A.: Deep Learning, MIT Press,
2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang,
X., Wang, G., Cai, J., and Chen, T.: Recent advances in convolutional neural
networks, Pattern Recogn., 77, 354–377, 2018. a
Guo, X., Li, W., and Iorio, F.: Convolutional Neural Networks for Steady Flow
Approximation, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International
Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining – KDD '16, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 2016,
481–490, 2016.
a,
b
Gutenberg, B.: The amplitudes of waves to be expected in seismic prospecting,
Geophysics, 1, 252–256, 1936. a
Hosseini, K., Sigloch, K., Tsekhmistrenko, M., Zaheri, A., Nissen-Meyer, T.,
and Igel, H.: Global mantle structure from multifrequency tomography using
P, PP and P-diffracted waves, Geophys. J. Int., 220,
96–141, 2019. a
Igel, H.: Computational seismology: a practical introduction, Oxford
University Press, 2017. a
Ioffe, S. and Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network
training by reducing internal covariate shift,
in: 32nd International
Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2015, 7–9 July 2015, Lille, France, 1, 448–456, 2015. a
Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J.: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980, 2014. a
Komatitsch, D. and Martin, R.: An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched
layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation,
Geophysics, 72, SM155–SM167, 2007. a
Komatitsch, D. and Tromp, J.: Introduction to the spectral element method for
three-dimensional seismic wave propagation, Geophys. J.
Int., 139, 806–822, 1999. a
Kong, Q., Trugman, D. T., Ross, Z. E., Bianco, M. J., Meade, B. J., and
Gerstoft, P.: Machine learning in seismology: Turning data into insights,
Seismol. Res. Lett., 90, 3–14, 2019. a
Krischer, L. and Fichtner, A.: Generating Seismograms with Deep Neural
Networks, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 11–15 December 2017, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2017. a
Krischer, L., Hutko, A. R., van Driel, M., Stähler, S., Bahavar, M.,
Trabant, C., and Nissen‐Meyer, T.: On-Demand Custom Broadband Synthetic
Seismograms, Seismol. Res. Lett., 88, 1127–1140, 2017. a
Leng, K., Nissen-Meyer, T., and van Driel, M.: Efficient global wave
propagation adapted to 3-D structural complexity: a
pseudospectral/spectral-element approach, Geophys. J. Int.,
207, 1700–1721, 2016.
a,
b
Leng, K., Nissen-Meyer, T., van Driel, M., Hosseini, K., and Al-Attar, D.:
AxiSEM3D: broad-band seismic wavefields in 3-D global earth models with
undulating discontinuities, Geophys. J. Int., 217,
2125–2146, 2019.
a,
b
Lerer, A., Gross, S., and Fergus, R.: Learning Physical Intuition of Block
Towers by Example, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on
International Conference on Machine Learning, 20–22 June 2016, New York, NY, USA, 48, 430–438, 2016.
a,
b
Lumley, D. E.: Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring, Geophysics, 66,
50–53, 2001. a
Moseley, B.: Code repository for deep learning for fast simulation of seismic waves in complex media, available at:
https://github.com/benmoseley/seismic-simulation-complex-media, last access: 9 August 2020. a
Nair, V. and Hinton, G.: Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann
Machines Vinod Nair, in: Proceedings of ICML, 21–24 June 2010, Haifa, Israel, 27, 807–814, 2010. a
Nath, S. K., Chakraborty, S., Singh, S. K., and Ganguly, N.: Velocity
inversion in cross-hole seismic tomography by counter-propagation neural
network, genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming techniques,
Geophys. J. Int., 138, 108–124, 1999. a
Newman, P.: Divergence effects in a layered earth, Geophysics, 38, 481–488, 1973. a
Ni, S., Tan, E., Gurnis, M., and Helmberger, D.: Sharp sides to the African
superplume, Science, 296, 1850–1852, 2002. a
Paganini, M., De Oliveira, L., and Nachman, B.: Accelerating Science with
Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in
Multilayer Calorimeters, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 1–6, 2018.
a,
b
Pytorch: available at:
https://www.pytorch.org (last access: 9 August 2020), 2016. a
Richardson, A.: Seismic Full-Waveform Inversion Using Deep Learning Tools and
Techniques, arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07232, 2018. a
Rietmann, M., Messmer, P., Nissen-Meyer, T., Peter, D., Basini, P., Komatitsch,
D., Schenk, O., Tromp, J., Boschi, L., and Giardini, D.: Forward and adjoint
simulations of seismic wave propagation on emerging large-scale GPU
architectures, International Conference for High Performance Computing,
Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC, November 2012, Salt Lake City, UT, 1–11, 2012. a
Röth, G. and Tarantola, A.: Neural networks and inversion of seismic
data, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6753, 1994.
a,
b
Russell, B. H.: Introduction to Seismic Inversion Methods, Society of
Exploration Geophysicists, 1988. a
Schuster, G. T.: Seismic Inversion, Society of Exploration Geophysicists,
2017. a
Sun, H. and Demanet, L.: Low frequency extrapolation with deep learning, 2018
SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, 14–19 October 2018, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2011–2015,
2018. a
Tarantola, A.: Inverse problem theory: methods for data fitting and model
parameter estimation, Elsevier, 1987. a
Thorne, M. S., Pachhai, S., Leng, K., Wicks, J. K., and Nissen-Meyer, T.: New
Candidate Ultralow-Velocity Zone Locations from Highly Anomalous SPdKS
Waveforms, Minerals, 10, 211, 2020. a
Valentine, A. P. and Trampert, J.: Data space reduction, quality assessment
and searching of seismograms: autoencoder networks for waveform data,
Geophys. J. Int., 189, 1183–1202, 2012. a
van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A.,
Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K.: WaveNet: A Generative
Model for Raw Audio, arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03499, 2016.
a,
b
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N.,
Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I.: Attention Is All You Need, arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762,
2017.
a
Wu, Y. and Lin, Y.: InversionNet: A Real-Time and Accurate Full Waveform
Inversion with CNNs and continuous CRFs, arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07875, 2018. a
Yang, F. and Ma, J.: Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic
velocity model building method, Geophysics, 84, R583–R599, 2019. a
Zhang, Z. and Lin, Y.: Data-driven Seismic Waveform Inversion: A Study on the
Robustness and Generalization,arXiv [preprint],
https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10262, 2018. a
Zhu, W., Sheng, Y., and Sun, Y.: Wave-dynamics simulation using deep neural
networks, Stanford Report, Stanford Vision and Learning Lab, Stanford University, CA, USA, 2017.
a,
b
