Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
Solid Earth, 9, 385–402, 2018
Solid Earth, 9, 385–402, 2018
Method article
06 Apr 2018
Method article | 06 Apr 2018

Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation on structural data in implicit 3-D geological modeling, a guide for disturbance distribution selection and parameterization

Evren Pakyuz-Charrier et al.

Related authors

Topological analysis in Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty propagation
Evren Pakyuz-Charrier, Mark Jessell, Jérémie Giraud, Mark Lindsay, and Vitaliy Ogarko
Solid Earth, 10, 1663–1684,,, 2019
Short summary
Integration of geoscientific uncertainty into geophysical inversion by means of local gradient regularization
Jeremie Giraud, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Mark Jessell, Roland Martin, and Evren Pakyuz-Charrier
Solid Earth, 10, 193–210,,, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Structural geology
Shear zone evolution and the path of earthquake rupture
Erik M. Young, Christie D. Rowe, and James D. Kirkpatrick
Solid Earth, 13, 1607–1629,,, 2022
Short summary
Mechanical compaction mechanisms in the input sediments of the Sumatra subduction complex – insights from microstructural analysis of cores from IODP Expedition 362
Sivaji Lahiri, Kitty L. Milliken, Peter Vrolijk, Guillaume Desbois, and Janos L. Urai
Solid Earth, 13, 1513–1539,,, 2022
Short summary
Detecting micro fractures: a comprehensive comparison of conventional and machine-learning-based segmentation methods
Dongwon Lee, Nikolaos Karadimitriou, Matthias Ruf, and Holger Steeb
Solid Earth, 13, 1475–1494,,, 2022
Short summary
Multiscale lineament analysis and permeability heterogeneity of fractured crystalline basement blocks
Alberto Ceccato, Giulia Tartaglia, Marco Antonellini, and Giulio Viola
Solid Earth, 13, 1431–1453,,, 2022
Short summary
Structural characterization and K–Ar illite dating of reactivated, complex and heterogeneous fault zones: lessons from the Zuccale Fault, Northern Apennines
Giulio Viola, Giovanni Musumeci, Francesco Mazzarini, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Manuel Curzi, Espen Torgersen, Roelant van der Lelij, and Luca Aldega
Solid Earth, 13, 1327–1351,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aldiss, D. T., Black, M. G., Entwisle, D. C., Page, D. P., and Terrington, R. L.: Benefits of a 3-D geological model for major tunnelling works: an example from Farringdon, east-central London, UK, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydroge., 45, 405–414,, 2012.
Allmendinger, R. W., Siron, C. R., and Scott, C. P.: Structural data collection with mobile devices: Accuracy, redundancy, and best practices, J. Struct. Geol., 102, 98–112, 2017.
Aug, C.: Modelisation geologique 3-D et caracterisation des incertitudes par la methode du champ de potentiel, PhD, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris, 220 pp., 2004.
Aug, C., Chilès, J.-P., Courrioux, G., and Lajaunie, C.: 3-D geological modelling and uncertainty: The potential-field method, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Springer, 145–154, 2005.
Bagchi, P.: Bayesian analysis of directional data, University of Toronto, Ottawa, Ont: National Library of Canada, 1987.
Short summary
MCUE is a method that produces probabilistic 3-D geological models by sampling from distributions that represent the uncertainty of the initial input dataset. This process generates numerous plausible datasets used to produce a range of statistically plausible 3-D models which are combined into a single probabilistic model. In this paper, improvements to distribution selection and parameterization for input uncertainty are proposed.