Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-479-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-479-2017
Research article
 | 
12 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 12 Apr 2017

Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces

Vincent Roche and Mirko van der Baan

Related authors

Throw variations and strain partitioning associated with fault-bend folding along normal faults
Efstratios Delogkos, Muhammad Mudasar Saqab, John J. Walsh, Vincent Roche, and Conrad Childs
Solid Earth, 11, 935–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-935-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-935-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Geophysics
Post-Caledonian tectonic evolution of the Precambrian and Paleozoic platform boundary zone offshore Poland based on the new and vintage multi-channel reflection seismic data
Quang Nguyen, Michal Malinowski, Stanisław Mazur, Sergiy Stovba, Małgorzata Ponikowska, and Christian Hübscher
Solid Earth, 15, 1029–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1029-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1029-2024, 2024
Short summary
Geodynamic controls on clastic-dominated base metal deposits
Anne C. Glerum, Sascha Brune, Joseph M. Magnall, Philipp Weis, and Sarah A. Gleeson
Solid Earth, 15, 921–944, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-921-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-921-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seismic wave modeling of fluid-saturated fractured porous rock: including fluid pressure diffusion effects of discretely distributed large-scale fractures
Yingkai Qi, Xuehua Chen, Qingwei Zhao, Xin Luo, and Chunqiang Feng
Solid Earth, 15, 535–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of surface-wave techniques to estimate S- and P-wave velocity models from active seismic data
Farbod Khosro Anjom, Frank Adler, and Laura Valentina Socco
Solid Earth, 15, 367–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Integration of automatic implicit geological modelling in deterministic geophysical inversion
Jérémie Giraud, Guillaume Caumon, Lachlan Grose, Vitaliy Ogarko, and Paul Cupillard
Solid Earth, 15, 63–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Addis, M. A., Last, N. C., and Yassir, N. A.: Estimation of horizontal stresses at depth in faulted regions and their relationship to pore pressure variations, SPE Formation Eval., 11, 11–18, 1996.
Ahmed, U., Markley, M. E., and Crary, S. F.: Enhanced In situ Stress Profiling With Microfracture Core and Sonic-Logging Data, SPE Formation Eval., 6, 243–251, 1991.
Amadei, B. and Stephansson, O.: Rock stress and its measurement, Springer, 1997.
Atkinson, G. M., Eaton, D. W., Ghofrani, H., Walker, D., Cheadle, B., Schultz, R., Shcherbakov, R., Tiampo, K., Gu, J., Harrington, R. M., and Liu, Y.: Hydraulic fracturing and seismicity in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Seismol. Res. Lett., 87, 631–647, 2016.
BCOGC: Investigation of observed seismicity in the Horn River basin, Tech. Rep., BC Oil and Gas Commission, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, available at: www.bcogc.ca/node/8046/download (last access: 7 April 2017), 2012.
Download
Short summary
Knowledge of in situ stress magnitudes and their spatial variability is critical for various topics, but local information on the stress field is often sparse and incomplete. In this case, analytic formulations, or numerical models, have to be used. In this study we describe and compare eight different strategies to predict the depth variation of stress within a layered rock formation. This reveals the inherent uncertainties in stress prediction from elastic properties and stress measurements.